2002: The New York Times Admitted that it had been Wrong
in Applauding a Military Coup in Venezuela
On April 11,
2002, a group of military officers arrested the democratically-elected
President Hugo Chavez and removed him from the Presidential Residence. On April
12, the military announced that Chavez had “stepped down” and installed a
businessman, Pedro Carmona, as President. Carmona issued a set of dictatorial
decrees that suspended the constitution, dismissed the National Assembly, the
state governors, and municipal leaders, dissolved the Supreme Court and the
National Electoral Council, and ordered the arrest of Cabinet Ministers. On
April 13, The New York Times editorialized that:
· “With yesterday’s resignation of
President Hugo Chavez, Venezuelan democracy is no longer threatened by a
would-be dictator. Mr. Chavez, a ruinous demagogue, stepped down after the
military intervened and handed power to a respected business leader, Pedro
Carmona.”[1]
A massive
uprising of Venezuelans supported by a group of loyal soldiers rescued Chavez
and restored him as President on April 14. On April 16, The New York Times
editorialized that:
· “In his three years in office, Mr.
Chavez has been such a divisive and demagogic leader that his forced departure
last week drew applause at home and in Washington. That reaction, which we
shared, overlooked the undemocratic manner in which he was removed. Forcibly
unseating a democratically elected leader, no matter how badly he has
performed, is never something to cheer.”[2]
1. New York Times, Hugo Chavez
Departs, April 13, 2002.
2. New York Times, Venezuela’s
Political Turbulence, April 16, 2002.
Comments
Post a Comment