2025: “Trump
Might Not Invade Venezuela Yet, But What He Is Doing Is Worse”
President
Trump has stationed a large amount of US military force in the Caribbean Sea
near Venezuela. He has threatened to destroy targets in Venezuela if Nicolas
Maduro is not removed as President. US forces have intercepted ships transporting
Venezuelan oil. A recent essay by Michelle Ellner, the Latin America Campaign
Coordinator at CODEPINK, analyzes the potential consequences of the U.S. not
invading Venezuela with military force, but rather using a strategy of economic
coercion. Her essay can be read here: https://venezuelanalysis.com/opinion/trump-might-not-invade-venezuela-yet-but-what-he-is-doing-is-worse/
Here are
some excerpts from her Essay:
“The loudest question in Washington right now is whether
Donald Trump is going to invade Venezuela. The quieter, and far more dangerous,
reality is this: he probably won’t. Not because he cares about Venezuelan
lives, but because he has found a strategy that is cheaper, less politically
risky at home, and infinitely more devastating: economic warfare.”
“Venezuela has already survived years of economic warfare.
Despite two decades of sweeping U.S. sanctions designed to strangle its
economy, the country has found ways to adapt: oil has moved through alternative
markets; communities have developed survival strategies; people have endured
shortages and hardship with creativity and resilience. This endurance is
precisely what the Trump administration is trying to break.”
“Rather than launching a military invasion that would
provoke public backlash and congressional scrutiny, Trump is doubling down on
something more insidious: total economic asphyxiation. By tightening
restrictions on Venezuelan oil exports, its primary source of revenue,
Trump’s administration is deliberately pushing the country toward a full-scale
humanitarian collapse.”
“By preventing Venezuela from exporting oil, which is the
revenue that funds food imports, medicine, electricity, and public services,
the Trump administration is knowingly engineering conditions of mass
deprivation. Under international humanitarian law, collective punishment is
prohibited precisely because it targets civilians as a means to achieve
political ends. And if this continues, we will see horrific images: empty
shelves, malnourished children, overwhelmed hospitals, people scavenging for
food. Scenes that echo those coming out of Gaza, where siege and starvation
have been normalized as weapons of war.”
“And this is how Trump can reassure the United States
Congress that he is not “going to war” with Venezuela. He doesn’t need to.
Economic strangulation carries none of the immediate political costs of a
military intervention, even as it inflicts slow, widespread devastation. There
are no body bags returning to U.S. soil, no draft, no televised bombing
campaigns. Just a steady erosion of life elsewhere.”
“Trump’s calculation is brutally simple: make Venezuelans so
miserable that they will rise up and overthrow Maduro. That has been the same
calculation behind U.S. policy toward Cuba for six decades—and it has failed.
Economic strangulation doesn’t bring democracy; it brings suffering. And even
if, by some grim chance, it did succeed in toppling the government, the likely
result would not be freedom but chaos—possibly a protracted civil war that
could devastate the country, and the region, for decades.”
Comments
Post a Comment