2016: The Supreme Court Ruled That the Actions of the
National Assembly were “Null and Void”
In the December
6,2015 National Assembly election, the opposition coalition (MUD) won 109
seats. Three additional seats were won by indigenous candidates from the sparsely-populated
state of Amazonas (Julio Ygarza, Nirma Guarulla, Romel Guzamana) who sided with
the opposition. Together, the three Amazonas delegates and the 109 MUD delegates
would make a two thirds super-majority.
On December
29, 2015, a losing Amazonas candidate filed a legal challenge with the Supreme
Court alleging that the three Amazonas candidates were elected as a result of
widespread fraud. On December 30 the Supreme Court issued a temporary
injunction against the three and ruled that they should not be sworn in as
Delegates until the fraud allegations were investigated [1]. The three Amazonas
delegates were sworn in on January 6, 2016 in defiance of the Supreme Court
ruling. On January 11 the Supreme Court ruled that the National Assembly was in
contempt by violating their order. The Court said: “Decisions taken by the
National Assembly while these citizens are seated will be absolutely null.” [2]
An editorial in the January 12 Washington Post referred to the Court’s
decision as “a gross abuse of power” and that “Venezuelan Leaders shred the
Constitution to hold on to power” [3].
On January
13, photos, audio recordings, and videos documenting opposition leaders buying
votes for the Amazonas delegates were released. [4] The three Amazonas
delegates resigned . National Assembly President Ramos Allup notified the
Supreme Court that the Assembly was in compliance with the Court’s order. The
contempt citation on the National Assembly was removed.
No longer in
contempt, the National Assembly passed four Laws including an Amnesty Law and a
Housing Law. The MUD coalition accused the Supreme Court of deliberately
stalling the investigation of the three Amazonas delegates and they were sworn
in as Delegates on July 28. On August 1, the Supreme Court declared the
National Assembly to be in contempt and issued a temporary injunction declaring
that all actions by the National Assembly would be void until the three
legislators were dismissed [5]
The National
Assembly remained in a state of contempt of the judicial system. The National
Assembly could have resolved the issue at any time by removing the three
delegates. The opposition-controlled Assembly was disinterested in resolving
the conflict as part of its campaign to delegitimize the government. The
stalemate was cited as evidence of Venezuela’s descent into “dictatorship.”[6]
1.BBC, Venezuela
court suspends three new opposition MPs, December 31, 2015
2, Venezuelan
Supreme Court:” National Assembly is Void,”Venezuelanalysis, January
12, 2016
3. New York
Times, Opinion: Venezuela’s leaders shred the constitution to hold onto
power, January 12, 2016.
4. Legislators present new evidence of
irregularities in Venezuela’s National Assembly Elections, Venezuelanalysis,
January 13, 2016.
5. Venezuelan Supreme Court Blocks Swearing-in of Amazonas
Legislators, Venezuelanalysis, August 3, 2016.
6. Has
Maduro Really Dissolved the National Assembly in Venezuela?, Venezuelanalysis,
April 1, 2017.
Comments
Post a Comment