2005: US
Defense Secretary Rumsfeld’s Criticism of Venezuela’s Purchase of 100,000
AK-47s Received No Support from Latin American Countries
In 2005, the Venezuelan armed forces were poorly equipped:
·
“The Venezuelan armed forces are poorly equipped
as a result of several years of underfunding.
According to an independent report, its armed forces are a ‘hollow
shell’ that is so weakened by budget cuts that soldiers patrolling the border
region often lack uniforms, boots, helmets, body armor and ammunition.” [1]
The Venezuelan Government began”
shopping around” to modernize its Armed Forces.[2] Upgrading the Country’s Army
Service Rifle was a high priority. Venezuela and ninety other countries began
using the Belgian FAL rifle in the 1950s. Most countries switched to other
rifles in the 1980s and 1990s. The FAL was still the main service rifle of the
Venezuelan Army in 2005.In 2005 Venezuela purchased 100,000 Kalashnikov AK-47
rifles from Russia.[2]
US Defense Secretary Donald
Rumsfeld criticized the purchase:
•
“I can’t imagine why Venezuela needs 100,000
AK-47s. I just hope that it doesn’t happen. I can’t imagine that if it did
happen, that it would be good for the hemisphere.” [2]
Hugo Chavez said “I consider it
the state’s responsibility to equip and train the armed forces of the nation.
And that is all I’m doing nothing more.”[3] Chavez said the military purchases
would be used to improve Venezuela’s ability to prevent drug trafficking along
its borders. Anna Gilmour of the defense magazine Jane’s said,
“Venezuela has increased its military purchases. But it is replacing obsolete
weapons and military equipment, instead of just buying new equipment or new
weapons.” Gilmour said that Rumsfeld may have “political” reasons for making
the comments about Venezuela.[4]
Rumsfeld’s concerns about
hemispheric threats from the purchase received no support from neighboring
Latin American countries:
“The US has adopted a policy
designed to isolate the Chavez administration. However, US policy has been
broadly rejected by other countries in the region who do not share Washington’s
assessment of the threat posed by the Chavez government. Washington’s attempts
to isolate Chavez because of his arms acquisitions have found little echo in
the region.”[1]
1.Perdomo and Bromley, CBMs in
Latin America and the effect of arms acquisitions by Venezuela, Elanco
Royal Institute Working Paper, September 22, 2005
2. New York Times, Rumsfeld in
Brazil, Criticizes Venezuela on Assault Rifles, March 24, 2005
3. Arms Control Association, Venezuela,
Russia Sign Weapons DeaL, Arms Control Today, September 2006
4. Venezuelanalysis, Venezuela
Rejects Rumsfeld’s “Concerns Over Arms Purchases, October 4, 2006
Comments
Post a Comment